In 1963, an 18-year-old woman was kidnapped and dishonour in Phoenix, Arizona. The patrol investigated the persona, (Miranda vs. the State of Arizona), and arrested Ernesto Miranda, a mentally unstable man. Miranda, who was 23-years-old at the time of his arrest, confessed that he had kidnapped and raped the woman. By confessing to the crime, Miranda was convicted of kidnapping and rape. However, when Miranda was arrested he was not advised of his rights as they are declared in the one-fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment states, No person shall be held to reception for a capital, or different infamous crime, unless on a presentment or blossom of indictment of a sybaritic jury, except in cases arising in the res macrocosma or nautical forces, or in the militia, when in material service in time of war or usual danger; nor shall some(prenominal) person be contentedness for the alike offense to be twice put in riskiness of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a security guard against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, with out due procedure of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
entirely stated, the Fifth Amendment outlines that anyone (including foreigners) arrested in the United States has original rights and privileges that should be spelled out for them at the time of the arrest. On appeal, Mirandas lawyers called direction to the fact that the police had neer told Miranda that he had the right to be represented by a lawyer, and that he could remain still if he wished to do so. In addition, Miranda was not told that everything that he say could be utilise against him. In conclusion, the United States Supreme chat up ruled in advance of the defendant by provided a 5 to... If you trust to get a spacious essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment